Feb
24
2010
Poor Wayfaring Man
The legalistic aspects of Mormonism are fascinating to me. Here is one.
Stare decisis is a legal concept meant to establish consistency in decisions made by courts. The idea is that once a decision has been made by a court about a certain point of law, future courts should respect that decision and follow suit. This approach conserves judicial resources by obviating the need for people to bring the same legal dispute to court over and over again, because they can look at past cases and reliably predict what a court is going to say about the issue. It also causes people to take more seriously the decisions of current courts, because today’s decisions are going to hold weight with other courts in the future. Thus, it is a way for courts to legitimize their own decisions by respecting the decisions of their predecessors. Stare decisis is a practical strategy for dealing with the fact that reasonable judges will disagree about what the law means, and even though it sometimes enshrines erroneous decisions into the law, it is generally considered a useful and effective element of the judicial system.
A similar concept is at work for the top leaders of the LDS Church (considered “prophets, seers, and revelators” by believing members of the faith), though the process goes largely unacknowledged. Continue reading
no comments | tags: LDS Church Policy, LDS legalism, Mormon Doctrine, policy vs. doctrine, prophets, stare decisis | posted in List Item 07, List Item 11, List Item 19, List Item 21, List Item 23, Mormon Culture, Mormon Doctrine
Feb
18
2010
Poor Wayfaring Man
Here is another post inspired, in part, by a reader’s comment. Deep Throat in the Deep South, in a comment rich with interesting Mormon cultural material, wrote the following:
Every blessing we have is predicated upon a law. You break the law, the blessing is gone.
There is a law, irrevocably decreed in heaven before the foundations of this world, upon which all blessings are predicated— And when we obtain any blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated. (D&C 130: 20-21)
One must be intelligent not to confuse administrative actions with the Gospel of Jesus Christ (i.e. truth) in its purest mode. There is a different between administration of earthly issues, the Truth of the Gospel, and, and what I call the “Doctrine of the Culture,” that some people cling to instead of the doctrine.
As a Mormon, I struggled with the legalistic LDS belief that all blessings a person receives from God are actually dependent upon his or her obedience to a specific Law (or body of Laws) of Heaven. The reason I struggled is that I could never pin down exactly what the Law was, despite the fact that I was desperate to follow it. (That seems to be a common theme in the LDS Church.) Continue reading
no comments | tags: Apostasy, Book of Mormon historicity, Boyd K. Packer, Brigham Young, doctrine & covenants, general authorities, Gordon B. Hinckley, heresy, LDS apologetics, LDS legalism, LDS spirituality, Leaving the Church, Mormon Doctrine, Mormon fundamentalism, Mormon History, obedience, polygamy, priesthood ordinances, prophets, skepticism, testimony, Truth | posted in List Item 01, List Item 19, List Item 20, List Item 23, Mormon Culture, Mormon Doctrine, Mormon Stories
Feb
13
2010
Poor Wayfaring Man
A reader posted a comment recently, asking two questions. Good ones. I answered the first one in my previous post, and the second one here.
Mormon Woman Wondering asked:
Please help me understand how you…speak with your children, with integrity to your beliefs and with sensitivity to their need for something to hold onto in this world.
This is a tough question, particularly for somebody like me, with a spouse who is active in the Church, and who wants our kids to be active too. Obviously, my solution is a compromise, and could possibly have been different if she felt differently. But I think this solution does take into account the potential need for kids to have something to hold onto as they develop their own worldview. Continue reading
4 comments | tags: inactivity, LDS Church Sunday curriculum, LDS morals and ethics, LDS social pressure, Leaving the Church, mixed-faith marriage, orthodoxy enforcement, raising kids | posted in List Item 05, List Item 08, List Item 22, Mormon Culture, Mormon Doctrine, Mormon Stories
Feb
12
2010
Poor Wayfaring Man
A reader posted a comment recently, asking two questions. Good ones. I will answer one of them here, and the other one in my next post.
Mormon Woman Wondering asked:
Please help me understand how you bore the gut-hole created by losing your faith.
I am not sure I understand what “gut-hole” means in this context. I have some guesses: Is it the psychological turmoil a person goes through when the philosophical basis for her lifestyle and choices is revealed to be deeply flawed and unreliable, and needs to be replaced? Is it the anxiety that accompanies the realization that she doesn’t know what to replace it with? Is it the nagging worry that she has set her children up to fail–to trust people and ideas that are not trustworthy? Is it the disappointment at finding that so much of her life has been spent earnestly pursuing and investing in what is ultimately a high-stakes fantasy? Continue reading
1 comment | tags: angst, Apostasy, Buddhism, doctrine & covenants, experience and understanding, inactivity, LDS Social Circles, Leaving the Church, parenting, Siddhartha | posted in List Item 22, Mormon Culture, Mormon Doctrine, Mormon Stories